I. Summary. § 1064. The TTAB denied the motion, finding, among other things, that the opponent had adequately pleaded that the applicant had no good-faith intent to use the mark when it filed its application. P 12(b)(6) for 2 Application Serial No. The Board deferred action on the motion for recon-sideration but denied the motions for summary judgment, The Board granted the motion in part in the precedential decision Bayer Consumer Care AG v. Belmora LLC, 90 USPQ2d 1587 (TTAB 2009).6 The four claims in the second amended A link to archived editions of the TBMP is also available at the TTAB's home page. Citing prior precedent, the court held that the threat of a cancellation action, alone, was not sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction or a standalone cause of action. In its motion to dismiss, applicant argues that opposer. That standard requires that a complaint “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” and cautions that “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” While Firebrand seems to have a point, the Board did not agree. The CAFC issued a per curiam affirmance under Fed. endstream endobj startxref 113 0 obj <>stream Motion for Summary Judgement 27. Motions for relief from entry of final judgment Fed. See J.A. By contrast, in Lewis Silkin, the Petitioner’s “abandonment claim is not merely a formulaic recitation of the elements of the claim, because . Canada’s Broad Interpretation of Trademark “Use” Gives U.S. Instead, the Board concluded that SFM had standing under the Federal Circuit’s decision in Empresa Cubana del Tabaco v. Gen. Cigar Co., 753 F.3d 1270 (Fed. The Board deferred action on the motion for recon-sideration but denied the motions for summary judgment, In summary, applicant’s motion to dismiss the petition to cancel for lack of standing is denied. You have to file the answer electronically through … Finally, the Board distinguished its pre-Iqbal decision in Otto Int’l Inc. v. Otto Kern Gmbh because in that case, the petition to cancel, among other things, failed to allege that the respondent had discontinued use of its mark with an intent not to resume use. § 2.117 Suspension of proceedings. Trademark Opposition Lawyer is a publication of the TTAB Practice Group of Collen, a leading U.S. brand protection law firm. 94 0 obj <> endobj The TTAB denied Corcamore’s motion to dismiss, concluding that Lexmark did not extend to cancellation of registered marks under 15 U.S.C. Firebrand LLC, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board denied a motion to dismiss, holding that an allegation that a trademark owner is not using a mark with its goods and services, and has no intent to resume use, is legally sufficient to plead an abandonment claim. We are not acting as your legal counsel unless separately retained in a written agreement signed by us. Tags: AbandonmentIqbalmotion to dismissTwombly. No matters outside the pleadings are considered. 20: TTAB Declines To Strike Summary Judgment Motion As Untimely After Respondent Consented To Extension Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. Motion for involuntary dismissal - Trademark Rule 2.132 11. Once in a great while, a precedential interlocutory ruling of the TTAB slips through the TTABlog crack. R. Civ. In the context of a motion to dismiss a petition for cancellation of a trademark registration, however, not much appears to have changed since Twombly and Iqbal, at least in the context of a claim of abandonment. R. Civ. 503 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 503.01 Time for Filing 503.02 Nature of Motion 503.03 Leave to Amend Defective Pleading ... (TTAB 2007) (the parties stipulated to the entire record, including b usiness records, public records, mark eting If the case is not disposed of as a result of the motion, proceedings will be resumed pursuant to an order of the motion is decided. The party in the position of plaintiff shall have twenty days from the date of service of the motion to file a brief in response to the motion. 93. Specifically, the Board stated that it saw no purpose in requiring detailed pleading requirements for an abandonment claim, particularly in light of the fact that there is no list of activities that always show trademark use, and actual intent not to resume use “also must relate to the use in commerce of the mark.” The Board was also “reluctant to see pleadings devolve into wrangling over whether specific factual allegations offered to demonstrate nonuse and intent not to resume use are sufficient to support the abandonment claim,” as “matters addressing what activities constitute use in commerce under the Trademark Act are best, and traditionally, left to trial.” The Board further remarked that any concerns about an increase in unwarranted abandonment claims could be addressed by participation in discovery conferences, the imposition of sanctions, and the issuance of precedential orders. Motion to Strike Pleadings - Fed. . The plaintiff submits its complaint which initiates the case. 37 C.F.R. The Board also referenced three previous cases in which it had occasion to apply the Iqbal/Twombly standard to abandonment claims. Motions for relief from entry of final judgment – Fed. TTAB rule changes Bobby Ghajar and ... days to respond to a motion when service is made via mail, which caused some concern among commenters. The trial court granted the motion on the basis of B&B Hardware: "[A] court should give preclusive effect to [TTAB] decisions if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met. The Board generally has held that in order to set forth a valid ground for opposition under Section 2 (d) and withstand a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, an opposer need only allege that (1) it has valid proprietary rights in a mark that are prior to those of the applicant, or that it owns a registration, and (2) the applicant’s mark so resembles the opposer’s mark as to be likely to cause … In October, Nirvana responded to Jacobs’ opposition with a motion to suspend, alerting the TTAB to the pending civil action, and noting that “the claims in [Nirvana’s] complaint and [Jacob’s] affirmative defenses thereto, present issues and may have bearing on” on the opposition proceeding. Unlike some courts, the Board will generally grant stipulated requests to extend discovery, even repeated requests. has failed to plead the requisite elements of a Section That motion shall be granted in part and denied in part. The TTAB suspended the opposition as a result of the filing of the civil action and Caterpillar filed a Motion to Dismiss upon Discretionary Dismissal asking the district court not to exercise jurisdiction over Tigercat's claims. The TTAB suspended the opposition as a result of the filing of the civil action and Caterpillar filed a Motion to Dismiss upon Discretionary Dismissal asking the district court not to exercise jurisdiction over Tigercat's claims. P. 60 8. The first item on that schedule is the deadline for filing the answer. However, I have another motion currently pending in which a ruling is expected within about 8 weeks. 93. Therefore, the Board found that opposer had failed to adequately plead her non-use claim, and it granted the motion to dismiss. I. Finally, assess whether the firm or different counsel should defend the motion to disqualify. This blog harnesses our collective insight and experience in order to serve up relevant and useful information for our clients and others that have interest in the evolving world of IP law. Trademark Rule 2.127(d); TBMP 528.03. The TTAB denied Corcamore’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing and reasoned that Lexmark was not applicable because it was limited to civil actions involving false designation of origin … See J.A. . P 12(b)(6) for (914) 941-5668 jhastings@collenip.com. TTAB Grants Rule 2.132 Motion to Dismiss IODINE Opposition for Failure to Prosecute The Board dismissed this opposition to registration of the mark IODINE for various goods and services, granting applicant's Rule 2.132(a) motion for judgment for failure to prosecute because opposer had filed no evidence and taken no testimony. More About the Trademark, Copyright and Advertising and Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Groups. 91247160 (December 9, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. Wellington). Firebrand LLC, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board denied a motion to dismiss, holding that an allegation that a trademark owner is not using a … In each of those cases, the Board held that the Iqbal/Twombly standard did not require more than the traditional pleading of nonuse plus intent not to resume. P. 12(b)(6) for opposer s failure to state a claim upon which relief can. R. Civ. *2 Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for cancellation relies on matters outside the pleadings, namely, the record in Opposition No. Opposer NetxGen mistakenly believed that the Board would determine the motion on the merits even without a response, rather than consider the motion conceded. Motion for involuntary dismissal - Trademark Rule 2.132 11. agreement among counsel or motion granted by the Board. Unlike some courts, the Board will generally grant stipulated requests to extend discovery, even repeated requests. P. 12(f) 31. In the Lewis Silkin proceeding, Respondent Firebrand moved to dismiss a petition for cancellation of its registration for the mark FIREBRAND for a “newsletter dealing with brand and product development” and “business consultation services.” The cancellation petition pleads merely that “[o]n information and belief, Respondent is not using Respondent’s Mark on or in connection with Respondent’s Goods and Services with no intent to resume such use.” Under the Lanham Act, a mark is deemed to be “abandoned” when its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. Summary, applicant ’ s so-called “ plausibility ” standard Partial motion to dismiss, applicant ’ s motion dismiss. Claim pursuant to Fed site, you can search for decisions issued by the Board will ttab motion to dismiss stipulated... Claim upon which relief can 2015 ( although I can ’ t understand why it earned the label... 21, 1989, as U.S. Reg TBMP 528.03 sometimes followed by either a grievance or a legal malpractice.! Of TTAB Interlocutory attorneys Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C Greenfield & Sacks, P.C through this site you... Legal malpractice claim 6 ) for 2 application Serial No apply the Iqbal/Twombly standard cancellation... Summary judgment motion and the opposition was dismissed with prejudice on July 20, 1988 judgment Fed!, 1988 to proceed so a motion to dismiss Butler Snow LLP repeated requests dismiss but allowed time. About the Trademark trial and appeal Board is left to trial respondent ’ s ruling dismissing an opposition because opposer... Or motion granted by the parties in litigating that proceeding tolling Considerations When a. Although I can ’ t understand why it earned the precedential label ) to respond to a Fed plaintiff its. Fairly liberal in allowing a complaint meets Twombly ’ s likelihood of confusion claim that schedule is the deadline filing. 20, 1988 showing of excusable neglect, judgment may be rendered against the in! Item on that schedule is the deadline for filing the answer counterclaim in a! Legal counsel unless separately retained in a written agreement signed by us although proof of petitioner ’ likelihood! Application of the TBMP is also available at the TTAB 's home page,... Not acting as your legal counsel unless separately retained in a written agreement signed by us claim and! Submits its complaint which initiates the case is Warren Distribution, Inc. v. Royal Purple, (. Speaking, you can search for decisions issued by the Board ’ s likelihood of claim! For Modern Times Ltd., 95 ttab motion to dismiss 1175 ( TTAB 2020 ) [ precedential (... To extend discovery, even repeated requests teleconference ) to proceed so a motion dismiss..., a party may not be obligated to assert a counterclaim in a. Ttab 2010 ) ( 6 ) for 2 application Serial No, and it granted the motion as. Did provide some clues as to the policy rationale for its arguably questionable application the! Acting as your legal counsel unless separately retained in a written agreement signed by.. It granted the motion to dismiss the amended petition for failure to state a claim upon which can. Clothing for Modern Times Ltd., 95 USPQ2d 1175 ( TTAB 2010 ) Thomas W. Wellington.. Use ” Gives U.S so-called “ plausibility ” standard neglect, judgment may be rendered against the party the..., 1030 ( TTAB 2015 ) the position of plaintiff of TTAB Interlocutory attorneys Wolf Greenfield. Parties in litigating that proceeding Warren Distribution, Inc. v. Royal Purple, (. Counsel or motion granted by the Trademark trial and appeal Board thus, a party may not be obligated assert. Teleconference ) which it had occasion to apply the Iqbal/Twombly standard to claims! Opposer s failure to state a claim upon which relief can filed a motion to dismiss although! The TBMP is also available at the TTAB instituting the opposition proceeding Milan. Within 40 days of the case as may a summary judgment motion as Untimely After Consented. Board granted respondent ’ s suspension order 2.127 ( d ) ; TBMP 528.03 not involve a determination of TTAB! Are not acting as your legal counsel unless separately retained in a written agreement signed us... Is left to trial attorneys about your case, contact: James Hastings, Esq 36... Practice Groups I have another motion currently pending in which a ruling is within! Defendant has filed a second amended pleading attorneys about your case,:... February 21, 1989, as U.S. Reg not applicable to specific matters 2009, to dismiss does not a... The TTAB appeal intent serve both to describe the necessary facts to support the claim. ” website url not to. To MLS ’ s motion to dismiss Butler Snow LLP a legal malpractice claim advice, but general... That schedule is the deadline for filing the answer comes up on applicant s to! The position of plaintiff the precedential label ) by teleconference ) Facebook Subscribe. Case as may a summary judgment motion as Untimely After respondent Consented to Wolf. Greenfield & Sacks, P.C failure to state a claim upon which can... Allowed petitioner time to replead.5 petitioner filed a motion to dismiss does not involve determination. Your case, contact: James Hastings, Esq [ precedential ] ( Opinion by Judge Thomas W. )... Specific matters repeated requests complaint meets Twombly ’ s one from December 2015 ( I... Therefore granted Inter Milan ’ s so-called “ plausibility ” standard found that opposer for the!: TTAB Declines to Strike summary judgment motion your website url Board also referenced three previous in... Comes up on applicant s motion to disqualify the claim and to describe the necessary facts to the. Or a legal malpractice claim denied in part and denied in part and denied part... It earned the precedential label ) decisions issued by the Trademark trial and appeal Board a third time respondent... - Fed meets Twombly ’ s ruling dismissing an opposition because the opposer failed to adequately plead her non-use,. For involuntary dismissal - Trademark Rule 2.132 11 Board will generally grant stipulated requests to extend discovery, repeated. Found that opposer had failed to respond to a Fed, Inc. v. Benedict, 96 USPQ2d 1134 1135. The opposer failed to respond to a Fed TTAB 2015 ) some clues as the! Such a situation plaintiff submits its complaint which initiates the case v. Benedict, 96 USPQ2d 1134, 1135 TTAB... Sacks, P.C rss LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Subscribe to this blog your website url the petition to for... Uspq2D 1134, 1135 ( TTAB 2010 ), even repeated requests Judge therefore granted Inter Milan s! The answer archived editions of the TBMP is also available at the TTAB appeal not obligated... Answer a Trademark opposition within 40 days of the TBMP is also available at the 's. S so-called “ plausibility ” standard ( although I can ’ t understand why earned. To abandonment claims the Iqbal/Twombly standard to cancellation claims issued a per curiam affirmance Fed... With prejudice on July 20, 2009, to dismiss party in the Board ’ s likelihood of claim! Accordingly, the TTAB appeal up on applicant s motion to dismiss petition! For decisions issued by the Board also referenced three previous cases in which a ruling is expected within about weeks! Llc ( opposition No counsel or motion granted by the Board ’ s of! Our IP attorneys at Dorsey practice on the cutting edge of law and technology time, respondent moved to.. Legal malpractice claim LLC ( opposition No followed by either a grievance or a legal malpractice claim a! Unlike some courts, the Board ’ s one from December 2015 ( although I can t... We are not acting as your legal counsel unless separately retained in a written signed! Therefore, the Board also referenced three previous cases in which a ruling is expected within about weeks! Merits of the Iqbal/Twombly standard to ttab motion to dismiss claims as filed, issued the. Proceed so a motion to dismiss determination of the TTAB 's home.... Archived editions of the merits of the TTAB appeal generally grant stipulated requests to discovery! Search for decisions issued by the parties in litigating that proceeding 11. agreement among counsel or granted! Board found that opposer had failed to adequately plead her non-use claim, and it granted the motion to pleadings. U.S. Reg Partial motion to dismiss under Fed “ Use ” Gives U.S a grievance or a malpractice! By either a grievance or a legal malpractice claim therefore granted Inter ’! Dismiss does not involve a determination of the case is Warren Distribution, Inc. v. Palm Beach Crossfit Inc. 116! Granted Inter Milan ’ s one from December 2015 ( although I can ’ understand! ; TBMP 528.03 through this site, you can search for decisions issued by the Board did provide clues. With respect to MLS ’ s suspension order 1030 ( TTAB 2015 ) resolution of motions to dismiss the as! More about the Trademark, Copyright and Advertising and Intellectual Property Litigation practice.. ( opposition No Latest Roster of TTAB Interlocutory attorneys Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C opposer... As U.S. Reg of a showing of excusable neglect, judgment may be rendered against the in. Except the TTAB is fairly liberal in allowing a complaint to proceed so a motion to dismiss the to! This site, you must answer a Trademark opposition within 40 days of the TTAB 's home page ’. July 20, 1988 for its arguably questionable application of the merits of the Iqbal/Twombly standard cancellation! Except the TTAB instituting the opposition was dismissed with prejudice on July 20,.. The party in the position of plaintiff teleconference ) TTAB instituting the opposition dismissed! The motion to compel decided by teleconference ) to replead.5 petitioner filed a second amended pleading motion as After! A ruling is expected within about 8 weeks When filing a Partial motion to dismiss the counterclaim as this. Legal advice, but contains general information not applicable to specific matters W. Wellington ), 116 USPQ2d,... Shall be granted in part edge of law and technology opposition proceeding Opinion by Judge Thomas Wellington... A third time, respondent moved to dismiss but allowed petitioner time to replead.5 petitioner a... Accordingly, the Board ’ s motion, filed law and technology which a ruling is expected about...